Procrastinaion Across Variables

Stefanie Page
Missouri Western State College

Abstract

This research is designed to determine if there is a varience between procrastination, educational levels, and students in a rural or urban setting. A procrastniation scale was given to high school and college freshmen in either urban or rural schools. I expect to find a higher rate of procrastination in t he high school students.


Introduction

This study was designed to find a variance in procrastination levels across education grade: high school or college, and the contrasts between rural and urban students.

Procrastination is defined by a lack of self-regulating performance, putting off work that could be under one's control (Tuckman,1991). Students frequently come across this problem in their academic careers. A common form of procrastination is waiting until the last minute to turn in papers or to study for an exam (Milgram,1993).

What are the reasons for procrastination according to students? The most frequent answers reported are poor time management, task aversiveness, and fear of failure, with the fear of failure accounting for 49.4% of the explanations (Milgram, 1993).

Behavioral procrastination is demonstrated by the tendency to delay a task to avoid threats to self-esteem, threat of failure, and a disregard for aversive tasks (Ferrari & Emmons,1995). There is a positive correlation between procrastination and low self control; the procrastinators are more interested with the desire for immediate pleasure.

One negative correlate with procrastination is the frequency of self reinforcement/reward; procrastinators do not reward themselves for an accomplished project as much an a non-procrastinator. Ferrari and Emmons (1993) go on to state that procrastinators may have low self esteem; they may believe they lack the ability to be successful in their task which leads to the delay in completing the project. Through studies by Tuckman (1991), this has been shown to be correct; students who describe themselves as procrastinators also tend to describe themselves as people who doubt their capabilities.

Procrastination is found to be a trait rather than task or course specific state characteristic. If you procrastinate in one area, you are just as likely to do the same in another area (Milgram,1993).

It is necessary to recognize procrastination and then do something about it. Procrastination on a larger scale could lead to total failure. The student must be ready to come to terms with procrastination to succeed in school. Milgram (1993) suggests three levels of guidance for students. First there must be intervention workshops set up for all students, to aid them in recognizing procrastination. Secondly, there must be secondary interventions for at risk students, and finally there must be counseling provided to students who may damage their academic career due to procrastination.


Methods

Subjects

There were 83 total participants; 24 from high schools and 59 from colleges. One group of data, with 34 participants was collected from Missouri Western State College from the freshman level class. Another group was from Highland Community College, with 25 freshman participants. Lafayette High School was the third group, consisting of 12 freshman participants. The final comparative group, with 12 participants, was collected from Wathena High School freshman.

Materials

The data was collected by using a scale developed by Bruce Tuckman (1991). It consists of 35 items which cover procrastination, and three additional demographic questions.

Procedure

The participants were students who were asked volunteer their class time to complete the scale; they were not necessarily randomly selected. The results were compared across grade of participants; high school or college, and rural students compared to city students.

Results

2 X 2 ANOVA F (1,79) =.534, p >.05 indicating a non-significant relationship between procrastination and ecucation.

2 X 2 ANOVA F (1,79) =1.48, p>.05 indicating a non-siginifuicant realationship between procrastination and rural or urban schools.

2 X 2 ANOVA F (1, 79), p> .05 indicating a non-significant interaction between procratsination, educational level, and urban or rurla schools.

The mean score on the procrastination scale for urban high school students was 48 while the mean score for rural students was 50. The total mean for all high school studenats was 49, refer tothe graph.


Discussion

This research showed a nom-significant realtionship between proctastination, level of education, and students in rural or urban schools. There does not seem to be a difference between the grade level of the students or if he/she attends a rural or urban school.

One limitation of this study was the low numbr of participants(93). More participants are needed to have statistically reliable research. The results from this study may not be generalized to different populations, such as honors classes or college prep schools.

For future research on procratstination, more participlants will be utalized to ascertain gernder differences. Another research idea could be to compare college graduates to people who have never attended college. An additional research concept would be to compare across different professions to discover if workers in certain career areas are more likely to procrastinate.

To educators and parents,hte lack f varience in procrastination levels between high school students and college students should be cause for worry. More education and guidance is necessary to prevent procrastination and its correlates: fear of failure, poor time management, and low self-esteem (Milgram, 1993). Results from future studies may be used to create teh necessary programs to prevent procrastination in students.


References

Berzonsky, M. (1992) Identity styles and coping strategies. Journal of Personality, 60:4 771- 788.

Ferrari, J. & Emmons, R (1995) Methods of procrastination and their relation to self control and self reinforcement. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,10:1 135 - 141.

Milgram, N., Batori, B., & Mowrer, D. (1992) Correlates of academic procrastination. Journal of School Psychology, 31 487 - 500.

Tuckman, B. (1991) The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 51 473 - 480.


Procrastination scale
Each item will have one of the following responses:  Enter the response which
BEST describes you in the given situation.

A.  That's me for sure!                                B.  That's my tendency. 
C.  That's not my tendency.                        D.  That's not me for sure!

Please enter the response on the answer sheet provided.  Please do not mark on the scale itself.  Thank you!!

1.  I needlessly delay finishing jobs, even though they are important.
2.  I postpone starting in on things I don't like to do.
3.  When I have a deadline, I wait until the last minute.
4.  I delay making tough decisions.
5.  I stall on igniting new activities.
6. I am on time for appointments.
7.  I keep putting off improving my work habits.
8.  I get right to work, even on life's unpleasant chores.
9.  I manage to find an excuse for not doing something.
10.I avoid doing those things which I expect to do poorly.
11. I  put all the necessary time into even boring tasks, like studying.
12. When I get tired of an unpleasant job, I  stop.
13. I believe in "keeping my nose to the grindstone."
14. When something is not worth the trouble, I stop.
15. I believe that things I do not like doing should not exist.
16. I consider people who make me do unfair and difficult things to be rotten.
17. When it counts, I can manage to even enjoy studying.
18. I am an incurable time waster.
19. I feel it is my absolute right to have other people treat me fairly.
20. I believe that other people don't have the right to give me deadlines.
21. Studying makes me feel entirely miserable.
22. I am a time waster now, and I can't seem to do anything about it.
23. When something is too tough to tackle, I believe in postponing it.
24. I promise myself I'll do something and then drag my feet.
25. Whenever I make a plan of action, I follow it.
26. I wish I could find an easy way to get myself moving.
27. When I have trouble with a task, it's usually my fault.
28. Even though I hate myself if I don't get started, it doesn't get me moving.
29. I always finish important jobs, with time to spare.
30. I look for a loophole or shortcut to get through a tough task.
31.When I'm done with my work, I check it over.
32. I get stuck in neutral even though I know  how important it to get started.
33. I never met a job I couldn't lick.
34. Putting off  until tomorrow is no the way I do it. 
35. I feel work burns me out.
36.  What grade are you in?
   A. Freshman in H.S.   B.  Sophomore in H.S.  
   C.  Freshman in coll.   D.  Sophomore in Coll.
37.What sex are you?
   A.  Male  B. Female
38.  What school do you go to?
   A.  Wathena H.S.                                B.  Lafayette H.S.
   C. Highland Community College       D.  MWSU

Back to MWSU Psychology Research Page
Back to PSY302 Research Page